Experiences at different places with different service
providers and customer-oriented professionals over the week prompted me to
dwell on this subject.
I was hunting for an electronic goods over the past few days
and when I entered a fancied showroom, the sales person just heard
me for a moment and said “I have only this model and if you are OK you can take
this”. His own reply made me realize that there are other options available in
the market but not in this showroom and helped me make a hasty exit.
In a leading Insurance corporation supporting life related
policies, I was greeted with the words “The computer is down”. The person must
have felt bad that he need not have revealed this, as the purpose of my visit
was to hand over some physical documents which did not require a computer.
Few weeks back, I approached a Nationalised Bank to update
my customer profile in their system, as I wanted a statement with the updated
profile urgently. After a day, when I called up to confirm the
completion, I was told that the Manager has gone to court to attend to some
case and only after his return this could be done. I was also informed that
even if he comes after few days only he could do it as the password is not
shared with others!
I was at another bank today and while I was talking to the
official, an agitated customer barged in to report that the bank’s ATM debited
his account twice though he has withdrawn the money only once. The customer was
obviously worried that his money was unduly debited and was also in urgent need
of the amount wrongly debited. The official coolly told him first that it can
be attended only by the Branch Manager who is on leave today and any action
could be taken only on his return tomorrow (hopefully). He also asked him to
write the whole incident in a letter and approach the bank after a week!!
As of my query as to why a cheque that was debited 3 days
back is still not reflecting in my account, a junior official of the bank said
that “For inter city branches it will take 5 days for a cheque to clear”. When
I reminded him that it is NOT an inter city cheque as both the banks are separated only
by few streets in the same Chennai city, he silenced me arrogantly and parroted
the same reason! Realising that he does not have any other answer, I went to
the senior official. The official, who was standing in his senior’s absence was
clearly not cut up for the job; said initially that there is no staff and hence
the delay. When I refused to accept this, he requested me to come later in the
day and then virtually pleaded to help him!
All the above-mentioned front office people were doing more
harm to the business, leave alone serving the customers. The hallmark of a front
office person is to first understand the customer’s requirement and serve
accordingly. Also, it requires some tact to ‘handle’ the situation to the
customer’s satisfaction, without unnecessarily revealing information that are
neither relevant nor for the customer interest. But, here are people who are trying to
sell a Geyser when all the customer wanted was an electrical switch!
Even when a Branch Manager who is omnipotent but unfortunately
not filling up his expectations of being omnipresent, is there any need for the
staff to expose the process lapse to customer? When a customer comes in with a
problem, he cannot be expected to hear yours!
The bankers would also do well not to cite the problems of
staff shortage and computer software issues any more to cover for their deficiency
in service. When the customers handover their money to the banks, they also
expect them to put on the thinking caps and be prepared for exigencies. When
few banks went down with the WTC in 2001, the banks rose back in lightening
speed within days to resume services, due to the banks’ preparedness and this
is precisely what differentiates the wheat from the chaff, in the present competitive
market.
Instead of revealing the dependencies on individuals, the
front office staff could have handled the customers better so that the internal
fissures does not permeate to the public who are blissfully unaware of the
shortcomings of the organization and continue to repose their faith. In a Bank,
the Cashier and the Dispatch staff were considered to be the most important
part of the bank as they interact directly with the customers and any
deficiency on their part would impact the performance and image of the bank. The
front office staff, who ‘IS’ the (mouth piece of the) organization should be
better trained in handling customers under different scenarios, as their
behaviour will decide on the customer continuity or otherwise.
The organisations while spending millions on technologies
would do well to spend a small part on training their staff in soft skills to
retain the existing clientele, when the Branch Manager is away - busy hunting for new clients!
Organizations have invested enough in technology and it's time they train their staff in optimally utilising them lest it will be like putting the cart ahead of the horse and expect miracles in customer satisfaction.
Training, not Technology seems to be the need of the hour.
No comments:
Post a Comment